CISIS, ISIS and the RCMP. Stephen Harper’s Terrorist Connections

The page has moved to:
this page

– Walt McGinnis

The Prime Minister of Canada,  Stephen Harper is trying to ram Bill C 51 through the Federal Parliament. Masquerading as legislation to fight terrorism Bill C 51 has been labeled as the most repressive set of laws ever proposed in Canadian history. At the same time  revelations by the Turkish Government indicate  Harpers Jordanian Embassy   collaborated with  ISIS, an organization labeled as terrorists by the Harper government. The Turkish government claim that the Canadian Embassy in Jordan  aided  the trafficking of British born children and at least 17 others into the hands of ISIS, in the middle of a war zone, in Syria.

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/politics/alleged-spy-arrested-in-turkey-for-helping-girls-join-islamic-state-was-working-for-canadian-embassy-in-jordan-reports

Instead of fighting terrorism it appears that Harper is helping to create terrorist organizations which he can use to scare Canadians into accepting Draconian laws like Bill C51. What is happening is right out of a  Public Relations Firm  play-book. It is Problem-Reaction-Solution time.

First,  the problem was created as Harper used Canada’s spies to help build the terrorist group ISIS.  The reaction, Canadians are gripped with fear ,then  the solution, Harper is offering a plan to protect Canadians from terrorism with Bill C-51.

One could wonder what special skills a CSIS agent had that led to his appointment as an Ambassador but let’s set this and several other astonishing events aside for now and examine one issue, Harpers connections to international terrorism .

The Ottawa Citizen   has reported that the man who was recently caught by Turkish police trafficking British born girls between Turkey and Syria and into the hands of ISIS was CSIS agent Mohammad Al Rashed. Reports claim Al Rashed reported to Bruno Saccomani, Harpers personal security guard who he appointed as the Ambassador to Jordan in 2013.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/harper-s-former-head-of-security-gets-ambassador-post-1.1358653

The chain of command is quite clear.  CSIS agent Al Rashed reported to  Ambassador Saccomani who reported to Prime Minister Stephan Harper. Harper appointed  Saccomani who in turn recruited Al Rashed.

One might assume it is case closed, Harper will resign in shame and Canadians will finally get back on track rebuilding a fragile democracy.

The question now is, are there enough remnants of free speech left in this country to expose the lies and deceit that will lead to stopping Bill C51 and to getting rid of Harper, once and for all? One could also ask is this just one of several schemes Mr Harper and company have been up to?

Canadians are in the midst of a governance crisis of a magnitude never seen before in this country. If Canadians all get together and if everyone concerned about human rights speak out and if the leaders of Canada’s newsrooms have the intestinal fortitude to step up and tell the truth for a change,  we could  hound Harper out of office  and  advert a full on neo-fascist government.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-atlantic-alliances-holy-war-against-the-islamic-state-isis-natos-role-in-the-recruitment-of-islamic-terrorists/539954

Advertisements

Cellphone Radiation Causes Car Accidents

The page has moved to:
this page

Does Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR) emitted from your cellphone 0r other wireless devices scramble your brain? If you say that is not possible,why then are drivers having up to ten times more accidents after they end their call? Evidence, decades old, appears to point to brain malfunction induced by wireless radiation as the unspoken cause of higher rates of car accidents. -Walt McGinnis

It has been 18 years since a major study appeared in the New England Journal of Medicine called Association between Cellular-Telephone Calls and and Motor Vehicle Collisions.(1) The study showed, not too surprisingly, that there was evidence that cell phone use was associated with higher rates of automobile accidents. In the conclusion of their study  the authors were vague as to what was the cause of the increased accidents but driver distraction was what the media  decided was the cause.

Since then dozens of industry funded studies about cellphone use and driver distraction have been published. Almost all of the studies reported that the driver was too busy talking on the phone to drive properly. It seemed researchers hardly ever discussed data that pointed towards other possible causes. Their conclusions focused instead on the main stream paradigm that the drivers mind was not on the business of driving while they talked on the cellphone. This made a lot of sense and it is probably a factor but it did not explain the sheer number of accidents occurring.

Reports stating that automobile accidents were caused by cellphone use were not unexpected. However in the late 90’s the real reason as to why the drivers had more accidents had the potential to cause a tremendous shock wave and prove to be of enormous importance, not only for the wireless industry, but also for the health and safety of billions of people who were about to start using wireless devices daily.

It appeared that many industry funded researchers did not notice that the data they provided in their research indicated that the cause of the accidents was not primarily driver distraction but something much more profoundly disturbing. The evidence from the Redelmeier Study as well as subsequent studies have shown that RFR emitted from cellphones was inhibiting brain function and possibly causing car accidents.(2)

Needless to say the ramifications of this revelation, if proven to be true, were enormous, especially because back in 1998 the wireless industry was about to explode into one of the largest and most profitable industries in the world. The idea that the RFR emitted from wireless devices was dangerous and a health threat was an inconvenient truth that stood between the industry and hundreds of billions of dollars in profits.

TOPP SECRET

The page has moved to:
this page

TOPP SECRET

Was the 2013 Election in British Columbia Rigged?
By Walt McGinnis

Blindsided and gob smacked. Adrian Dix on election night.

It has been  a year since the provincial election in British Columbia and the fog is slowly lifting off well-kept secrets regarding what caused the Adrian Dix campaign to fall apart and astonishingly how he seemed to be the last guy to realize it. This story is not about the injustice of NDP losing, because one could argue that they are no better than the Liberals, rather it is about the terrible reality that powerful people and public relations firms can change  election outcomes and governments, and that the citizens of Canada may have lost their power to stop them. (1)(2)

This is a scenario to consider. With the Tar-sands pipelines not built and the Liquid Natural Gas development still in its unsure infancy as well as several scandals like the BC Rail give away, the BC Hydro financial catastrophe on top of the smart meter fiasco all to be kept under control, the election results could not be left to chance. The Liberals looked like the best bet so they were supported by Industry and their lobbyists. And what better way to steer the outcome of an election than to manage both sides?

Of all the irregularities in the campaign the oddest situation was allowing Brian Topp to continue as Dix’s campaign manager. Topp was a partner in a public relations firm that had two other partners working for the Liberals.

It appears  the early  NDP lead was invented  by corporate funded pollsters which when reported in the corporate funded  media  created apathy and lower voter turnout specifically amongst soft NDP supporters, then a series of what has been called mistakes in the  NDP campaign caused voter support to further plummet,  and  strangely   this vital information was kept  from the leader of the NDP and the party until it was too late to salvage the election.

Topp  took over the NDP campaign, mismanaged his advertising, mismanaged his image, mismanaged his campaign strategy by not criticizing the Liberals in key areas, isolated and ignored grassroots activists on key issues, took contradictory and vague positions on BC Hydro and other issues and basically alienated their base support.